MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2590831125

An Empirical Analysis of the Adoption of Food Safety and Quality Practices in the Canadian Food Processing Industry

2006· article· en· W2590831125 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zuhair A. Hassan, Richard Green, Deepananda Herath

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Safety and Hygiene
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood safetyBusinessQuality (philosophy)MarketingFood processingFood industryFood qualitySurvey data collectionControl (management)Critical control pointQuality managementHazardEconomicsFood scienceService (business)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HIS CHAPTER ATTEMPTS TO ANSWER TWO QUESTIONS: What are the relationships between the degree of adoption of food safety and quality practices and establishments’ characteristics? And what are the associations between the adoption of food safety and quality practices and market performances of food processing establishments? Data on the adoption of food safety and quality practices were obtained from the 1998 Survey of Advanced Technology in the Canadian food processing industry. Three safety and five quality-oriented practices were identified in the survey. To analyze the impact of adoption of food safety and quality practices on market performance of Canadian food processing establishments, information from the 1998 survey was linked to data from the Annual Survey of Manufacturers. The 1998 Survey reported that 94 percent of the Canadian food processing establishments use at least one of the eight practices, 74 percent use four or more, and 42 percent use six or more. The Survey indicated also that good manufacturing practices, continuous quality improvement, acceptance sampling, and hazard analysis critical control points (HACCP) are the food safety and quality practices most commonly used by the Canadian food processing establishments. The study shows that adoption intensity of food safety and quality practices is very closely linked to establishments’ characteristics. In particular, the results indicate that size, country of control, and innovativeness have more influence than industry, major markets served, or level of inspection on the adoption intensity of food safety and quality practices. Moreover, the results suggest that establishments in the Canadian food processing industry are more likely to adopt a combination of food safety and quality oriented practices than to adopt safety or quality oriented practices alone. For market performance, the results provide some evidence that the adoption of food safety and quality practices is positively associated with establishments’ performance. In particular, the results suggest that adoption intensities and market shares are closely linked.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.838

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFood Safety and HygieneFrench-language works237,207