Current era clinical outcomes of castration-resistant prostate cancer in real-life population study in Quebec, Canada.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
226 Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) death is mainly due to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) which results from disease progression despite androgen ablation therapy (ADT). Little is known about clinical outcomes and trends of real-life CRPC management in the present era, which has become very complex. Our study aimed to analyze healthcare services use, clinical outcomes and survival trends in real-life management of CRPC in Quebec, Canada. Methods: The study cohort consisted of 7,123 patients which shown evidence of CRPC from January/2001 to July/2013, selected from the public healthcare insurance programs the Régie de l’Assurance Maladie du Québec (RAMQ) databases. Survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Maier and the difference in survival between pre-/post-docetaxel (Doc) (2002-2005 vs 2008-2011) era by log-rank test. The association between Doc exposure and survival was evaluated by Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for several co-variables. Results: Chemotherapy was offered to 17% of patients, while 45% were kept on maximal androgen blockade (MAB) alone, or offered Abiraterone (3%). Androgen targeted therapies (MAB or Abiraterone) were the treatment of choice for the elderly population (mean age 78.8 and 78 ±7, respectively) while chemotherapy was offered to younger patients (mean age 72 ±7.3). Survival rates at 1 and 2 years after the initiation of chemotherapy were 52% and 26% in post-Doc era vs 46% and 17% in the pre-Doc period. In patients receiving first line chemotherapy only, hospitalization due to PCa was a poor prognostic predictor (HR: 2.0; 95%CI: 1.5-2.6), as expected. In addition among patients without previous hospitalization the risk of death was higher in the pre- vs post-Doc era (HR: 1.7 CI: 1.003-2.851). Conclusions: Patient age seems to be a strong determinant in CRPC therapy selection. In patients without serious complications leading to hospitalization, survival was greatly improved in the post-Doc era. Our data also supports that patients older than those in the TAX327 trial (72 vs 68) may equally benefit from chemotherapy. This is encouraging as we hope to observe comparable results for new approved therapies for CRPC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".