Molecular tumor grading of non muscle invasive bladder cancer based on whole transcriptome analysis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
467 Background: There is an unmet need for a comprehensive genomic characterization of non muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). NMIBC comprise over 70% of all bladder cancers at presentation. They have highly variable clinical behavior that is not always adequately predicted on the basis of their histological grade (2004 World Health Organization low and high grade, LG-HG). The discrepancy between phenotype and genotype is compounded further by interobserver variability in pathological grading. We have previously established methods for whole transcriptome RNAseq from formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissues (FFPE). Methods: Whole transcriptomic analysis of 110 NMI FFPE BC both LG and HG was performed incorporating messenger RNA expression, splice variants, gene fusion, and pathway perturbation. We used a discovery (n = 40) and a validation cohort (n = 70). These data were integrated and tested for correlation with both pathological grading and clinical outcomes. Grade Risk Index (GRI) score quantifying how closely a patient's transcriptome is related to a reference set of LG NMIBC samples was established. Conventional pathological grading was reviewed by 3 different expert uro-pathologists and interobserver variability calculated. Results: Unsupervised clustering of data from RNA sequencing uncovered classification of three robust - - nonoverlapping, prognostically significant subtypes of NMIBC with distinct GRIs and signatures. When applied by expert pathologists, interobserver variability in histological grading was observed in 17.5%. In the intermediate group (GRI 0.13 to 0.19), pathologists disagreed in 37.5% whether BC was LG or HG. HG NMIBC clustered with MIBC. LG NMIBC in the intermediate GRI group included either very bulky tumors or extremely rare metastatic LG BC (n = 4). HG disease was associated with a shift in BMP signaling and a germ stem cell-like phenotype. Multiple components of the centromere complex and APOBEC3B were upregulated in HG BC. FGFR3::TACC3 fusion events were observed in LG NMIBC only (11.5%). Conclusions: Whole transcriptomic sequencing data delineated three molecular classes of NMIBC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".