MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Association of time to adjuvant chemotherapy (TTAC) and overall survival among patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiation.

2013· article· en· W2591339568 on OpenAlexaff
Gillian Gresham, Caroline Speers, Ryan Woods, Winson Y. Cheung, Kimberly Schaff, Mayo Fung, Hagen F. Kennecke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCapecitabineColorectal cancerInternal medicineStage (stratigraphy)OxaliplatinMultivariate analysisUnivariate analysisChemotherapyCancerProportional hazards modelSurgeryOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

461 Background: Studies suggest that delayed adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) beyond 8 weeks is associated with inferior survival in early-stage colon cancer (CA). The optimal TTAC in rectal CA remains unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic effect of TTAC in stage II and III rectal CA treated with standard preoperative (op) chemoradiation. Methods: Patients with stage II/III rectal CA treated with pre-op chemoradiation, received post-op AC, and referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency between 1999 and 2008 were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using Kaplan Meier and Cox regression methods to evaluate the association between TTAC and outcomes. X-tiles cut-point analysis was performed to determine the optimal TTAC. Results: A total of 327 eligible patients were identified: median age 61 (range 22-85), 70% male, and 75% stage III. In terms post-op AC, 51% received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 32% received capecitabine, 12% received 5-FU and oxaliplatin, and 5% received other chemotherapy. Median TTAC was 7.0 weeks (wks) (range 1.6-33.3 wks). Cut-point analysis revealed the optimal TTAC to be 5.6 wks (HR: 0.42, 95%CI 0.22-0.82, p=0.0087). Initiation of AC within optimal TTAC (5.6 wks) and 6 wks from date of surgery (sx) was associated with a significant survival benefit while no significant effect was seen at 8 wks. TTAC of ≤ 6 wkswas found to be a significant prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (p=0.047) adjusted for ECOG, age, sex, stage, margin status, and grade. In stratified analysis by stage, patients with stage III disease benefited from AC (p=0.018) while those with stage II did not (p=0.71). Conclusions: In this study, the optimal TTAC was 6 weeks or less. Initiation of AC within this time frame was associated with improved OS. This is less than the optimal timeframe indicated in the literature for colon CA. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicColorectal and Anal CarcinomasFrench-language works237,207