MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The characteristics and correlates of dyspnea (D) in advanced cancer patients (ACP)

2005· article· fr· W2591452996 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sahithya L Reddy, Ahmed Elsayem, Lucy B. Palmer, Gurvinder Kaur, T. Zhang, Éduardo Bruera

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineAnxietyDepression (economics)Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleUnivariate analysisCancerGastroenterologyMultivariate analysisPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

8019 Background: D is a frequent and devastating symptom in advanced cancer. It results from pulmonary pathology, but other causes contribute to it. There has been a limited attempt to characterize this symptom clinically, especially breakthrough D(BTD). Methods: 74 ACP with D underwent assessment of D and other symptoms using Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS, 0–10), Oxygen-Cost Diagram(OCD)], Oxymetry, Pulmonary Function Tests [VC, FVC, FEV1, MIP,PFR], Hospital Anxiety and Depression [HADS], and a detailed clinical questionnaire of daily characteristics of dyspnea. Results: Two types of D were observed, constant D(CD) as well as a breakthrough D (BTD). 28/74 (37.8%) patients (pts) had continuous D(CD). 14/28 (50%) pts with CD also had episodes of BTD. BTD was the sole symptom in 46/74 (62.1%) pts. Overall BTD was found to occur in 60/74 (81%) of patients. 4/60 (6.6%) of pts had D of more than 15 minutes duration (minimal latency period of short acting opioids). 46/60 (76.6%) pts had BTD lasting less than 5 minutes. 8/60 (13.3%) patients had less than 2 BTD episodes/day, 9/60 (15%) had more than 6 BTD epiosdes/day, and 45/60 (75%) had 2–6 BTD episodes/day. In univariate analysis, D (ESAS) was associated significantly with fatigue (p<0.0001), sleep (p=0.002), anxiety(ESAS) (p=0.006), depression(ESAS) (p=0.01), feeling of well-being (p=0.03), OCD(p=0.001). D (OCD) was significantly associated with HADS depression (p=0.001), fatigue (p=0.01), and VC (p=0.04). In multivariate analysis, dyspnea was significantly associated with fatigue (p=0.001), FEV1 (p=0.004), pain (0.01), and depression (p=0.03); this model explained 34% of the variation.D (OCD) was significantly associated with depression (p=0.0006) and FEV1 (p=0.045) although the model explained only 21% of the variation (R-Square). Conclusions: D is a breakthrough symptom(BTD) of very short duration in most cancer patients, and need different treatment algorythm compared to CD. D is a multidimensional construct commonly occurring with a cluster of other symptoms, requiring a multi-modality approach. Traditional pharmacological approaches will be ineffective in most patients with BTD. This new characterization should be useful for clinical trials. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.397 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research→French-language works237,207→