Systems-based analysis of dendritic nonlinearities reveals temporal feature extraction in mouse L5 cortical neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
What do dendritic nonlinearities tell a neuron about signals injected into the dendrite? Linear and nonlinear dendritic components affect how time-varying inputs are transformed into action potentials (APs), but the relative contribution of each component is unclear. We developed a novel systems-identification approach to isolate the nonlinear response of layer 5 pyramidal neuron dendrites in mouse prefrontal cortex in response to dendritic current injections. We then quantified the nonlinear component and its effect on the soma, using functional models composed of linear filters and static nonlinearities. Both noise and waveform current injections revealed linear and nonlinear components in the dendritic response. The nonlinear component consisted of fast Na + spikes that varied in amplitude 10-fold in a single neuron. A functional model reproduced the timing and amplitude of the dendritic spikes and revealed that they were selective to a preferred input dynamic (~4.5 ms rise time). The selectivity of the dendritic spikes became wider in the presence of additive noise, which was also predicted by the functional model. A second functional model revealed that the dendritic spikes were weakly boosted before being linearly integrated at the soma. For both our noise and waveform dendritic input, somatic APs were dependent on the somatic integration of the stimulus, followed a subset of large dendritic spikes, and were selective to the same input dynamics preferred by the dendrites. Our results suggest that the amplitude of fast dendritic spikes conveys information about high-frequency features in the dendritic input, which is then combined with low-frequency somatic integration. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The nonlinear response of layer 5 mouse pyramidal dendrites was isolated with a novel systems-based approach. In response to dendritic current injections, the nonlinear component contained mostly fast, variable-amplitude, Na + spikes. A functional model accounted for the timing and amplitude of the dendritic spikes and revealed that dendritic spikes are selective to a preferred input dynamic, which was verified experimentally. Thus, fast dendritic nonlinearities behave as high-frequency feature detectors that influence somatic action potentials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".