MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2591636087 · doi:10.1080/01658107.2017.1285319

Massive Oculomotor Nerve Enlargement: A Case of Presumed Schwannomatosis

2017· article· en· W2591636087 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Ophthalmology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOculomotor nerveAnatomyMagnetic resonance neurographyMagnetic resonance imagingTrochlear nerveCranial nervesNeuromaPalsyPathologyRadiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 45-year-old man presented with a slowly progressive pupil-involving third nerve palsy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a tubular lesion extending from the interpeduncular cistern through the cavernous sinus and into the left orbit where it branched into a superior and an inferior division, clearly outlining the anatomy of the third cranial nerve. Multiple other, less pronounced, enlarged cranial nerves were noted. The differential diagnosis included chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (HMSN), neurofibromatosis (NF), and schwannomatosis. The absence of other muscle weakness and of sensory symptoms combined with normal peripheral nerve conduction studies effectively ruled out the hypertrophic polyneuropathies and pointed to a syndromic cause of multiple benign peripheral nerve sheath tumours (PNSTs). The authors are treating this case as presumed schwannomatosis, a syndrome similar to NF2 with much lower frequency of acoustic neuromas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it