MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Molecular Characterization of a PU.1 Transcription Complex Formed on the IL-1β Proximal Promoter.

2004· article· en· W2591756406 on OpenAlexaff
Trang Hoang, Benoı̂t Grondin, Martin Lefrançois, Marianne St Denis, Daniel G. Tenen, Kazuo Waga

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Canadian institutionsLeukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMolecular biologyLeucine zipperCcaat-enhancer-binding proteinsTranscription (linguistics)Transcription factorPromoterBiologyGeneDNARecombinant DNAElectrophoretic mobility shift assayGene expressionNuclear proteinChemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The gene coding for the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β is induced at the transcription level in differentiating macrophages and in stress response. Interestingly, PU.1 and C/EBPβ, two transcription factors implicated in IL-1β gene expression are not induced by stress exposure, while c-Jun is strongly induced. Strikingly, this upregulation of c-Jun is required for IL-1β induction, as cells expressing a c-Jun antisense construct fail to respond to stress exposure. We have mapped the induction of IL-1β gene expression to its proximal promoter and show that it is mediated by the transcriptional synergy between C/EBPβ, c-Jun and PU.1 via specific DNA binding sites for C/EBPβ and PU.1 only. To elucidate how PU.1 and C/EBPβ cooperate with c-Jun at the molecular level, we have optimized a DNA binding assay based on IL-1β promoter fragments immobilized on beads to isolate protein complexes from nuclear extracts, which were subsequently eluted and identified by Western blotting. We show that PU.1 or C/EBPβ alone directly bind this promoter fragment via specific sequences while purified recombinant c-Jun fails to do so. However, the presence of either PU.1 or C/EBPβ on the promoter allows for a recruitment of c-Jun to the DNA template, mediated by direct protein-protein interaction. Interestingly, the leucine zipper domain of c-Jun is essential for its interaction with C/EBPβ while dispensable for PU.1 interaction in vitro whereas its basic domain is required for both interactions. Furthermore, we show that PU.1 and C/EBPβ cooperatively bind the IL-1β promoter, resulting in a synergistic recruitment of c-Jun. Finally, we show that the strength of interaction of c-Jun mutants with PU.1 or C/EBPβ determine the strength of transcription output and c-Jun mutants that fail to associate with either PU.1 or C/EBPβ are transcriptionally inactive. In contrast, c-Jun mutants exhibiting increased homodimerization are more active that the wild type protein. Taken together, our data suggest that c-Jun homodimers can be targeted to the IL-1β promoter in the absence of a specific DNA binding element, and conclude that PU.1 and C/EBPβ are specifically tethered to the IL-1β promoter while c-Jun cooperatively binds these proteins and acts as a transcriptional co-activator. We propose a mechanism based on an initial binding of PU.1 and C/EBPβ to the IL-1β promoter followed by a cooperative recruitment of c-Jun, resulting in transcriptional synergy and IL-1β gene expression in stress response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207