MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2592043107

Environmental Organizations Wokring With Respect To Aquatic Nuisance Species In The Great Lakes Area

2016· article· en· W2592043107 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jessica A. Lordi

Bibliographic record

VenueOcean and coastal law journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuisanceEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementFisheryEnvironmental protectionEcologyGeographyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Great Lakes hold the largest freshwater system on Earth. Both a highly valuable and vulnerable asset, the United States and Canada have established myriad laws and agencies to protect against environmental degradation in the Great Lakes region. This Article discusses the organizations that preserve this precious resource. These organizations are not an exhaustive list and are limited to principle organizations working with respect to aquatic nuisance species in the Great Lakes. Here, the objective is to define the goals, administrative processes, and relations between all of these organizations. This Article relates these functions, based on prior environmental proceedings, to a pending aquatic nuisance species issue in the Great Lakes: the Asian carp infiltration. Finally, this Article advocates for an overarching governmental organization to manage and control all of the current agencies and organizations. Part II provides information on the environmental organizations that work to solve the aquatic nuisance species problem in the Great Lakes. Part II discusses how the aquatic nuisance species problem creates a need for cooperation. Further, it summarizes the laws that give power to the organizations in the Great Lakes to aid the ballast water issue, including the Non-Indigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act, the National Invasive Species Act of 1996, and the Lacey Act. Part II also provides a discussion of how state law fills in gaps in the federal regulatory framework. Part III supplies a list of the main organizations that serve, protect, and restore the environment in the Great Lakes. These organizations include the National Invasive Species Council, Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and the International Joint Commission. Part IV discusses a pending issue regarding Asian carp, an aquatic nuisance species in the Great Lakes, and explains how these organizations are likely to manage the Asian carp and the potential environmental problems it presents. Part IV also proposes an overarching governmental organization to manage and control all of the current agencies and organizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOcean and coastal law journalSame topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207