Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMO Examina, naquela obra de Gilberto Freyre, a atenção sociológica que o autor dispensou aos cantos de negros, senhores e mestiços, sobretudo às chamadas modinhas populares. Observa o pioneirismo de Freyre em tratar do assunto, mostrando como as transformações urbanas foram responsáveis pela produção musical a partir de poemas do período romântico da literatura brasileira. Finalmente, mostra como Freyre apontou a tendência de menosprezo às criações culturais de caráter local, sempre repelidas pelo patriarcalismo dominante. ABSTRACT Folk Music in The mansions and the shanties. v. 28, n. 1, p. 89-102, jan./jun. 2000. Examines Gilberto Freyre’s sociological attention to the songs of the negroes mongrels, and masters in Brazilian society in XIX century, mainly the so called modinhas (a tipical kind of love song in Brazil at that time). Call attention to Freyre’s pioneering in studying that matter showing the way urban changes were a relevant cause of the large musical production from poems of the romantic period in Brazilian literature. Concludes showing that Freyre pointed out the trend to disdain the cultural local works, mainly in the field of the arts in general, as a result of the prejudices of the patriarchal ruling classes. RÉSUMÉ La musique populaire dans “Sobrados e mucambos”. v. 28, n. 1, p. 89-102, jan./jun. 2000. Il examine dans cette oeuvre de Gilberto Freyre l’attention sociologique avec laquelle l’auteur s’intéressa aux chants des noirs, des blancs et des métis, surtout en ce qui concerne les “modinhas” (petites chansons) populaires. Il observe l’esprit de pionnier de Gilberto Freyre en traitant ce sujet et en montrant comment les transformations urbaines furent responsables de la production musicale à partir de poèmes de la période romantique de la littérature brésilienne. Finalement, il montre comment Freyre mit en évidence le mépris des créations culturelles de caractère local, toujours repoussées par le patriarcalisme dominant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".