MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2592440669 · doi:10.1128/aem.00062-17

Mechanisms of Inactivation of Dry Escherichia coli by High-Pressure Carbon Dioxide

2017· article· en· W2592440669 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied and Environmental Microbiology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Inactivation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta Innovates Bio SolutionsAlberta Innovates - Health Solutions
KeywordsEscherichia coliSupercritical fluidChemistrySupercritical carbon dioxideBacteriaMutantCarbon dioxideMicrobiologyBiochemistryBiologyGeneOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT High-pressure carbon dioxide processing is a promising technology for nonthermal food preservation. However, few studies have determined the lethality of high-pressure CO 2 on dry bacterial cells, and the mechanism of inactivation remains unknown. This study explored the mechanisms of inactivation by using Escherichia coli AW1.7 and mutant strains differing in heat and acid resistance, in membrane composition based on disruption of the locus of heat resistance, and in genes coding for glutamate decarboxylases and cyclopropane fatty acid synthase. The levels of lethality of treatments with liquid, gaseous, and supercritical CO 2 were compared. The cell counts of E. coli AW1.7 and mutants with a water activity (a W ) of 1.0 were reduced by more than 3 log 10 (CFU/ml) after supercritical CO 2 treatment at 35°C for 15 min; increasing the pressure generally enhanced inactivation, except for E. coli AW1.7 Δ gadAB . E. coli AW1.7 Δ cfa was more susceptible than E. coli AW1.7 after treatment at 10 and 40 MPa; other mutations did not affect survival. Dry cells of E. coli were resistant to treatments with supercritical and liquid CO 2 at any temperature. Treatments with gaseous CO 2 at 65°C were more bactericidal than those with supercritical CO 2 or treatments at 65°C only. Remarkably, E. coli AW1.7 was more susceptible than E. coli AW1.7 Δ cfa when subjected to the gaseous CO 2 treatment. This study identified CO 2 -induced membrane fluidization and permeabilization as causes of supercritical mediated microbial inactivation, and diffusivity was a dominant factor for gaseous CO 2 . IMPORTANCE The safety of dry foods is of increasing concern for public health. Desiccated microorganisms, including pathogens, remain viable over long periods of storage and generally tolerate environmental insults that are lethal to the same organisms at high water activity. This study explored the use of high-pressure carbon dioxide to determine its lethality for dried Escherichia coli and to provide insight into the mechanisms of inactivation. The lethality of high-pressure CO 2 and the mechanisms of CO 2 -mediated inactivation of dry E. coli depended on the physical state of CO 2 . Liquid and supercritical CO 2 were ineffective in reducing the cell counts of dry E. coli isolates, and the effectiveness of gaseous CO 2 was related to the diffusivity of CO 2 . Results provide a novel and alternative method for the food industry to enhance the safety of low a W products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it