MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2592526495

Joint Models for Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Point Processes

2016· article· en· W2592526495 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alisha Albert‐Green

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicPoint processes and geometric inequalities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoint (building)Computer sciencePoint (geometry)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In biostatistics and environmetrics, interest often centres around the development of models and methods for making inference on observed point patterns assumed to be generated by latent spatial or spatio-temporal processes. Such analyses, however, are challenging as these data are typically hierarchical with complex correlation structures. In instances where data are spatially aggregated by reporting region and rates are low, further complications may result from zero-inflation.\nIn this research, motivated by the analysis of spatio-temporal storm cell data, we generalize the Neyman-Scott parent-child process to account for hierarchical clustering. This is accomplished by allowing the parents to follow a log-Gaussian Cox process thereby incorporating correlation and facilitating inference at all levels of the hierarchy. A primary focus for these data is to jointly model storm cell detection and trajectories. To do so, storm cell duration, speed and direction are included in a marked point process framework. The thesis also proposes a general approach for the joint modelling of multivariate spatially aggregated point processes with the observed outcomes being zero-inflated count random variables. For such models, we incorporate correlation between the random field assumed to generate events and mean event counts. This is applied to lung and bronchus cancer incidence by public health unit in Ontario and a study of Comandra blister rust infection of lodgepole pine trees in British Columbia.\nThe key contributions from this thesis include the following: 1) developing a spatio-temporal hierarchical cluster process that incorporates correlation at all levels of the hierarchy, 2) joint modelling of a hierarchical cluster process and multivariate marks, 3) extending the framework for the joint modelling of multivariate lattice data to enable decomposition of the sources of shared spatial structure and 4) investigating aspects of the partial misspecification of joint spatial structure for multivariate lattice data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0070.005
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.138 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)Same topicPoint processes and geometric inequalitiesFrench-language works237,207