MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2592721731 · doi:10.1016/j.jms.2017.02.016

Giant K-doubling and in-plane/out-of-plane mixing in the asymmetric methyl-bending bands of CH3SH

2017· article· en· W2592721731 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Bradley G. Guislain, E.M. Reid, R. M. Lees, Li‐Hong Xu, Sylvestre Twagirayezu, David S. Perry, Bishnu P. Thapaliya, Mahesh B. Dawadi, Brant Billinghurst

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Molecular Spectroscopy · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of SaskatchewanUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersBasic Energy SciencesNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsPhysicsAsymmetrySpectral lineCoupling (piping)BendingAtomic physicsPlane (geometry)Mixing (physics)Molecular physicsGeometryMaterials scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In analyzing high-resolution spectra of the methyl-deformation bands of methyl mercaptan recorded at the Canadian Light Source synchrotron, we have encountered interesting interactions between certain levels of the ν4 in-plane asymmetric CH3-bending mode and its ν10 out-of-plane bending partner below. The origin of the K = 0A ν4 substate is just 0.2 cm−1 higher than that of the K = 2A ν10 substate, while the K = 0E ν4 origin is only 0.035 cm−1 below the K = 2E ν10 origin. These very close accidental near-degeneracies lead to substantial perturbations in the spectrum. For the former, the A+/A− asymmetry K-doublet coupling rules are such that the A− component of the 2A ν10 doublet interacts and mixes strongly with the 0A+ ν4 levels whereas the 2A+ component is unaffected. The 2A− levels are pushed rapidly downwards by the coupling creating an extremely large apparent K = 2A asymmetry splitting. We call this “giant K-doubling” by analogy with a comparable phenomenon seen for methanol. The 0A+ ν4 state, in turn, is perturbed upward and passes through the descending K = 1A+ ν4 state between J = 22 and 23, leading to distinct local perturbations near the level-crossing. The 0E ν4 and 2E ν10 coupling produces a correspondingly strong repulsion and mixing between those two substates, and gives rise to a forbidden K = 0 ← 3E intermode sub-band in the spectrum via intensity borrowing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Molecular SpectroscopySame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207