Surgical management of pivot-shift phenomenon in a dog
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CASE DESCRIPTION A 6.8-year-old neutered male Labrador Retriever-Poodle mix was evaluated because of continued left pelvic limb lameness unresponsive to conservative management 1 year after undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO). CLINICAL FINDINGS A jerking lateral movement of the left stifle joint was detected during walking. Orthopedic examination revealed a pivot-shift phenomenon (PSP). Palpation elicited no signs of discomfort over the TPLO plate or caudomedial aspect of the stifle joint. Radiography revealed complete bone fusion at the osteotomy site and only mild joint effusion. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME Arthrotomy was performed at the medial aspect of the stifle joint, revealing no meniscal tears. The previously applied plate was removed, and an extracapsular, synthetic, ligament-like biomaterial was placed to counteract internal tibial rotation, thereby eliminating the PSP. Six weeks later, lameness had improved considerably with no evidence of PSP; 8 weeks after surgery, the dog was assessed for sudden-onset lameness in the right pelvic limb. Cranial cruciate ligament rupture was suspected, and TPLO was performed. The PSP was identified intraoperatively, so an extracapsular implant was placed. Six weeks later, the dog had only mild lameness and no evidence of PSP in either pelvic limb. In a follow-up telephone conversation 1 year later, the owner reported no obvious lameness or gait abnormalities. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Use of an extracapsular implant effectively eliminated the PSP following TPLO in the dog of this report and can be considered as an intra- or postoperative option for dogs with PSP that responds poorly to conservative management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".