Evolutionary and functional data power search for obsessive-compulsive disorder genes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a severe psychiatric disorder linked to abnormalities in the cortico-striatal circuit and in glutamate signaling. We sequenced coding and regulatory elements for 608 genes implicated in OCD from humans and two animal models (mouse and dog). Using a new method, PolyStrat, which prioritizes variants disrupting evolutionarily conserved, functional regions, we found four strongly associated genes when comparing 592 cases to 560 controls. These results were validated in a second, larger cohort. NRXN1 and HTR2A are enriched for coding variants altering postsynaptic protein-binding domains, while CTTNBP2 (synapse maintenance) and REEP3 (vesicle trafficking) are enriched for regulatory variants. The rare coding variant burden in NRXN1 achieves genomewide significance (p=6.37×10 −11 ) when we include public data for 33,370 controls. Of 17 regulatory variants identified in CTTNBP2 and REEP3 , we show that at least six alter transcription factor-DNA binding in human neuroblastoma cells. Our findings suggest synaptic adhesion as a key function in compulsive behaviors across three species, and demonstrate how combining targeted sequencing with functional annotations can identify potentially causative variants in both coding and noncoding regions, even when genomic data is limited.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.044 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".