Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor Decreases Angina and Improves Exercise Capacity in Patients with Chronic Refractory ‘No Option’ Ischemic Heart Disease.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Granulocyte-Colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely used in the treatment of hematological malignancies. The administration of G-CSF is a novel therapy for ischemic heart disease (IHD), but current data are controversial and the safety and efficacy of G-CSF in acute or chronic IHD is unclear. Aim: to assess safety and efficacy of G-CSF administration and stem cell mobilization in patients with chronic refractory ‘no option’ IHD. Methods: After baseline cardiac assessment (CA) [Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), Bruce exercise stress test (EST), persantin-Sestamibi and dobutamine-echocardiographic imaging], stable ‘no option’ IHD patients received open-label G-CSF 10μg/kg for 5 days, with an EST (to facilitate myocardial cytokine generation and stem cell trafficking) on the 4th and 6th days. After 3 months, CA and the same regimen of G-CSF and ESTs was repeated, but in addition, leucopheresis and a randomized double-blinded intracoronary infusion of either CD133+ or unselected cells was performed (randomized data remains blinded). Final CA was 3 months thereafter. Results: Thirteen patients (12 male, 1 female, mean age 62) received 21 cycles of G-CSF. There were no deaths, Q-wave AMIs or any complications with long-term sequelae, although, transient troponin-I elevation (n = 3) and thrombocytopenia (n = 2) were observed. Mean CD133+ cell count rose from 1.28 to 56.12 x1012/L (p = 0.001). There was no age-related trend towards lower numbers of G-CSF mobilized CD34+ cells in the IHD patients, as compared to a group of younger (<60 y.o) normal male donors (n = 66). After the first cycle of G-CSF, SAQ angina frequency and physical limitation scores improved, and EST time increased (all p < 0.01). There was further but less marked improvement in each of these parameters after the second cycle of G-CSF and cell infusion. Overall, SAQ angina frequency score improved 46 points (95% CI +22 to +70, p = 0.003). This was reflected by reduced anginal frequency and nitrate use (both p < 0.005). Overall, SAQ physical limitation score improved 26 points (95% CI +17 to +35, p = 0.0003), EST time improved 97 seconds (95% CI +41 to +153, p = 0.005) and Duke Treadmill Score improved 4.3 points (95% CI −0.2 to +8.8, p = 0.058). Conclusions: G-CSF and intracoronary cell infusion is safe in chronic ‘no option’ IHD patients. In this phase I study G-CSF improved anginal frequency, nitrate use and EST performance. A placebo controlled phase II trial investigating G-CSF with an appropriate cytokine stimulus is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".