LIMB SALVAGE WITH DISTAL FEMORAL REPLACEMENT IN THE ABSENCE OMALIGNANCY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endoprosthetic reconstruction as a form of limb salvage in the management of malignant disease is common. We present our experience with custom-made distal femoral replacement as a form of limb salvage in the absence of malignancy. 49 cases of distal femoral replacement were identified using the unit database. There were 18 males and 31 females, with a mean age at operation of 62.3 years (range 26–86). There were 29 cases of failed total knee replacements, 8 cases of fracture associated with bone loss, non-union or deformity, 7 periprosthetic fractures, 3 aneurysmal bone cysts, and one case each of avascular necrosis and Gorham’s disease. Clinical and radiographic review of all available patients, including a functional assessment with the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) Score and Toronto Extremity Salvage (TES) score was undertaken. The average follow-up was 5.4 years (range 1 to 29 years). Three types of endoprosthesis were used, rotating hinge, fixed hinge and arthrodesis prosthesis. One patient required amputation at 2 months following post-operative wound infection with methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus and subsequent inability to provide adequate soft tissue coverage. There was one revision at 16 months for deep prosthetic infection. 21 patients were available for functional follow-up. The mean MSTS score was 63.7 (range 16.0–86.7) and the mean TES score was 59.4 (range 9.4–87.5). Custom-made distal femoral replacements have an established role in limb-salvage surgery for malignant disease. This series demonstrates the reconstructive capability of custom prostheses in non-malignant disease, where deformity causes functional embarrassment or when massive bone loss would normally lead to amputation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".