MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2593215098 · doi:10.1158/1538-7755.disp16-c92

Abstract C92: [Advocate Abstract:] The Disparity of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices in College-Age Women 18-26 years old

2017· article· en· W2593215098 on OpenAlexaff
Francesca Weaks

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFamily medicineVaccinationDemographyLogistic regressionHuman papillomavirusPopulationGerontologyEnvironmental healthImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: In 2006, two vaccinations with guidelines were released to prevent against the Human Papillomavirus (HPV), and was recommended for all females' ages 11-12. Updated guidelines target females ages 11-12, and encourage catch up vaccinations for ages 13-26. The original recommendations by the CDC and other medical professionals did not address females ages 14-26. In 2006, females ages 14-26 were not recommended to receive the vaccination but were and still are the highest risk population for contracting HPV. During the ages of 14-26 years old, most females begin sexual intercourse and become vulnerable to sexually transmitted diseases Objective: To investigate the key factors that contributes to college-aged students initiating and completing the HPV vaccination. Participants: College students ages 18-26 attending Towson University enrolled in selected Health Science Classes during Summer Session 2012. Methods: Data were collected during the summer session of 2012 from students enrolled in Health Science classes at Towson University Department of Health Science. Classes were selected from the available summer classes that were offered and had approval from the professor .Students completed a survey regarding their Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of HPV either during an in-class session or via Blackboard. Statistical analysis was conducted using chi-square, independent t-test, and logistic regression. Citation Format: Francesca Weaks. [Advocate Abstract:] The Disparity of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices in College-Age Women 18-26 years old. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Ninth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2016 Sep 25-28; Fort Lauderdale, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(2 Suppl):Abstract nr C92.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1570.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.501
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207