MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2593226347 · doi:10.1386/jafp.9.3.287_1

The roads to Gissing’s Grub Street: An interview with Christopher Douglas

2016· article· en· W2593226347 on OpenAlexaff
Tom Ue

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Adaptation in Film & Performance · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaGeorge (robot)PublishingArt historyPerformance artArtPoetryHistorySociologyMedia studiesLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Gissing’s 1891 novel New Grub Street follows the careers and personal lives of a number of writers, including Edwin Reardon and Jasper Milvain, as they negotiate with the increasingly globalized publishing industry of Victorian England. BBC Radio 4’s latest adaptation is in two 58-minute episodes that aired on 3 and 10 September 2016. Earlier dramatizations include three one-hour episodes, on 13, 20 and 27 August 1972, produced by Jane Morgan and adapted by Gabriel Woolf (Coustillas 1972: 19); and on 8, 15 and 22 September 2002, produced by Janet Whitaker and dramatized by Tony Ramsay (Coustillas 2002: 21). The latter adaptation was uniformly praised by Paul Bailey in the TLS (11 October 2002): ‘Tony Ramsay’s three-part serialization of Gissing’s dank masterpiece was exemplary in every particular, and Janet Whittaker’s production could not be faulted’. Harold Pinter performed the role of the narrator in this adaptation. Bailey calls attention to the resonance that the novel has for those in the literary world, both in the nineteenth century and beyond: ‘Tony Ramsay’s brilliant adaptation told Radio 4’s substantial audience many salutary truths about the lives of those writers who weren’t Dickens or Thackeray or George Eliot. I hope, too, that it caused them to realize that nothing much has changed in what is known as the “literary world”’. Directed and produced by Gary Brown, BBC Radio 4’s new adaptation of New Grub Street was recorded at BBC Drama North’s studios in Salford Quays in Manchester from 5–8 July 2016. It stars adaptor Christopher Douglas as Gissing; Henry Lloyd-Hughes, Milvain; Sam Alexander, Reardon; Emily Pithon, Amy and Edith; and Olivia Hallinan, Marian. Since 2005, Douglas has co-written and starred in Ed Reardon’s Week, which won the Radio Programme of the Year in 2005 and again in 2010 at the Broadcasting Press Guild Awards. A novelization of the first series appeared in 2005. A prolific writer, Douglas has worked on theatre, radio, television, books and journalism, and his credits include How to be Eighteenth Century (2006) for BBC4 and BBC2 and How to be Edwardian (2007) for the former. As I have suggested in my article on Gissing’s revival in the TLS (6 October 2016), Douglas imaginatively brings together Gissing the man and his oeuvre, a link established, for instance, by the doubling of Pithon as Reardon’s wife Amy and Gissing’s second wife Edith Underwood. Douglas makes a number of fresh in-roads into the novel: it is never clear with which writer character Gissing identifies. Here, Gissing is visibly juggling between three (i.e., Milvain, Reardon and Alfred Yule). In the following interview, I discuss with Douglas his research into Gissing, the synergies between fact and fiction that are brought to bear in this adaptation and the storylines that he retains and omits from New Grub Street.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0280.013
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Adaptation in Film & PerformanceSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207