MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2593288693 · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04169

Bead-Extractor Assisted Ready-to-Use Reagent System (BEARS) for Immunoprecipitation Coupled to MALDI-MS

2017· article· en· W2593288693 on OpenAlexafffund
Huiyan Li, Robert Popp, Michael Chen, Elizabeth MacNamara, David Juncker, Christoph H. Borchers

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General HospitalMcGill University and Génome Québec Innovation CentreUniversity of Victoria
FundersGenome British ColumbiaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsGovernment of CanadaGenome Canada
KeywordsChemistryChromatographyExtractorReagentImmunoprecipitationImmunoassayMass spectrometryMagnetic beadProcess engineeringBiochemistryAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantitative protein assays play an important role in the study of biological functions. Immunoassays and mass spectrometry are two main technologies for quantifying proteins in biological samples. The combination of immunoprecipitation (IP) with MALDI technology delivers high assay sensitivity and specificity, but the sample preparation procedure involves multiple washing and transfer steps. These steps can be performed either manually (requiring significant time and labor) or automatically (requiring the purchase of a complex liquid-handling workstation). This bottleneck has limited the widespread adoption of this technology. We present here the Bead-Extractor Assisted ready-to-use Reagent System (BEARS) technology for simplified, low cost protein and peptide immunoprecipitation combined with MALDI-MS detection. All of the reagents are stable during long-term storage and can be prepared in advance. In the BEARS technology, a magnetic-bead extractor is used to handle beads from 96 wells simultaneously. A BEARS-based method was developed for plasma renin activity (PRA) and was evaluated on fifty-three clinical samples. These experiments showed that the BEARS assay had an LOD and linear range comparable to the manual method and an automated iMALDI PRA assay, but was 4-times faster than the manual approach. The BEARS iMALDI results also correlated well with a conventional ELISA PRA assay, with a coefficient of determination of 0.98. The BEARS technology provides convenience and affordability, and extends the use of IP-based mass spectrometry technology to most research and clinical laboratories, including those in developing countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207