Expression of Immune Memory Markers CD8 α α and Interleukin−7 Receptor on CD8+ T Cell Subsets among HIV−1 Infected Patients.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Evidence from animal models suggests that the expression of CD8α α homodimer on CD8+ T-cells plays a key role in the generation of long-lived memory cells. However, very little information is available in the human clinical setting. Here, we examined immunophenotypic patterns of CD8+ T-cell subsets expressing CD8α α with other markers involved in generating and maintaining memory cells such as interleukin-7 receptor (IL-7Rα ) and circulating levels of IL-7 and IL-15, in three well-defined groups of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1)-infected individuals including aviremic (n=15), viremic (n=31) and slow-progressor (n=15). In addition, immunophenotypic patterns were correlated with immune activation markers (CD38/HLA-DR), which are known to be an important factor in HIV-1 disease pathogenesis. Cell-surface expression of CD8α α , IL-7Rα and CD38/HLA-DR on CD8+ naïve, central memory, pre-terminal and terminal effector memory T-cells was measured by eight-color flow cytometry on freshly peripheral blood samples. IL-7 and IL-15 levels were measured by ELISA and viral loads were assessed by PCR. Group differences in the CD8+ T-cell subsets expressing each antigen tested were evaluated using the unpaired nonparametric Mann Whitney U test. Correlations were determined by Spearman’s correlation tests. Compared to slow-progressor subjects, expression of CD8α α was significantly reduced in aviremic and viremic patients and this reduction occurred mainly within naïve and central memory T-cell subsets and not in effector memory compartments. In contrast, persistent antigenemia in viremic patients appeared to lead to IL-7Rα loss mainly on central and effector memory subsets and not on naive T-cells. Compared to aviremic and viremic patients, slow-progressor subjects had lower levels of circulating IL-7, normal levels of IL-15, CD8α α and IL-7Rα , and reduced activated T-cells. Overall, expression of CD8α α was not significantly related to IL-7Rα although negative associations were evidenced within all CD8+ T-cell subsets. However, in viremic patients, naïve and central memory cell subsets expressing CD8α α were positively correlated with viral load but not with CD8+ T-cell subsets expressing immune activation markers. Together, these results provide new insights into the role of CD8α α /IL-7Rα along with immune activation markers in maintaining memory populations during HIV-1 infection. The inter-relationships between these immune memory markers require further investigations, which may help understanding the mechanisms of antiviral control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".