MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2593492593

Smart antenna arrays — A geometrical explanation of how they work

2002· article· en· W2593492593 on OpenAlexaff
Peter F. Driessen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmitterBandwidth (computing)Directional antennaRayleigh scatteringChannel (broadcasting)PhysicsAntenna (radio)Topology (electrical circuits)Rayleigh fadingComputer scienceTelecommunicationsAcousticsOpticsElectrical engineeringFadingEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For fixed bandwidth and total radiated power, with Rayleigh fading, a wireless system with multiple antennas at both transmitter and receiver has a channel capacity which grows linearly (rather than logarithmically) with the number of antennas. This result, which assumes separate information is sent out of each transmit antenna, holds true even though the transmitter does not know the complex channel transfer characteristic. By explicitly spreading out the antennas well beyond a wavelength, we show that such capacities can be achieved not only on Rayleigh channels with many scatterers, but also on deterministic channels with direct line-of-sight (LOS) paths only and no scatterers. Roughly speaking, the wide spacing, replicates the effect of scatterers which create images and thus serves to spread out the apparent source of the signals over a wider angular range. In this way capacities on the order of C lin = nlog 2 (1 + ρ) bps/Hz can be obtained for LOS as well as Rayleigh channels when n transmit and n receive antennas are used. In contrast, when the transmit antennas are closely spaced, the number of degrees of freedom on a LOS channel degenerate, resulting in capacities of only C log = log 2 (1 + nρ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied ElectromagneticsSame topicAntenna Design and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207