MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2593626431 · doi:10.1190/geo2016-0145.1

Wavefield simulation of 3D borehole dipole radiation

2017· article· en· W2593626431 on OpenAlexafffund
Junxiao Li, K. A. Innanen, Guo Tao, Kuo Zhang, Laurence R. Lines

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryBP (Canada)
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPerfectly matched layerBoreholeAzimuthOpticsDipoleIsotropyReflector (photography)GeologyReflection (computer programming)AcousticsRadiation patternAnisotropyPhysicsFinite-difference time-domain methodComputational physicsComputer scienceAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reflections in acoustic borehole-logging data can be used to image near-borehole geologic structures, using either monopole or dipole measurements, the latter of which resolve azimuthal ambiguities. Dipole methods in particular can characterize small and subtle fractures in reservoir environments. Accurate tools for wavefield simulation are required to account for wave modes in and out of the borehole, and for the receiver responses to these modes. We have evaluated a 3D elastic staggered-grid finite-difference method for isotropic and anisotropic media in the context of the borehole acoustic imaging problem. Based on the convolutional perfectly matched layer and the multiaxial perfectly matched layer schemes, a hybrid perfectly matched layer method was developed and implemented to reduce artificial boundary reflections. The superiority of this hybrid perfectly matched layer beyond the convolutional perfectly matched layer and the multiaxial perfectly matched layer was proven based on numerical benchmarks in isotropic and anisotropic media. Numerical simulation of radiation, reflection, and multipole reception of elastic waves, excited by a dipole source, was carried out. To optimize azimuthal detection, the relationships between S-wave polarization as well as source-receiver offset and source-reflector angle was analyzed. Results indicated that the S-S reflection is most sensitive to the angle between the incident ray and the normal to the reflector. Its maximum amplitude occurs as the incident angle reaches its critical value, a fact that can be used to calculate the total propagation distance of the S-S wave. The critical angle as well as the SH-wave velocities of geologic structures outside the borehole can thus be determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207