Effects of alternative establishment systems on resource availability, understorey composition and tree performance in juvenile hybrid poplar plantations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of different understorey management practices on tree–weed dynamics and associated tree establishment were investigated in newly planted hybrid poplar plantations containing Walker poplar (Populus deltoides × (P. laurifolia × P. nigra)) and its progeny Okanese poplar (Walker × (P. laurifolia × P. nigra)). Trees were established in 2012 on a research site in northeastern Alberta using one of four treatments: business-as-usual (BAU; herbicide, tillage, then planting), extended fallow (BAU + additional tillage and herbicide before planting), a cover crop interseeded on BAU areas, and a no-till treatment where trees were planted directly into sod receiving prior chemical weed control but no tillage. Tree survival and growth, herbaceous vegetation cover and composition, soil conditions (N availability, water content and temperature), together with light availability, were measured over three consecutive growing seasons (2012–2014). Okanese outperformed Walker in all treatments and was more responsive to vegetation control, indicating greater plasticity and potential for short-rotation-intensive-culture plantations. Further, tree performance was improved by extended chemical and mechanical (fallow) site preparation prior to tree planting. This treatment resulted in sustained control of understorey vegetation, in particular competitive perennial forbs and graminoids, and increased light and nutrient availability to trees. These results also highlighted the importance of controlling perennial rather than annual herbaceous competitors prior to and during plantation establishment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".