Are Communication Tools Effective in Increasing Reporting Rate of Acute Hemolytic Reactions (AHR) In ITP Patients Treated with Rh (D) Immune Globulin?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 4677 BACKGROUND: Acute Hemolytic Reactions (AHR) associated with administration of Rh(D) Immune Globulin (WinRho® SDF, Cangene Corporation, Winnipeg, MB, Canada) have been infrequently reported during the last 15 years. AHR's as defined were any case reporting hemoglobin decrease, haptoglobin decrease, elevation of bilirubin occurring within hours to number ofdays after WinRho® SDF treatment irrespective of the degree of change from baseline. AHR's where plasma or urinary hemoglobin were positive were categorized as cases of Intravascular Hemolysis (IVH). AIMS/PURPOSE: To determine if communication tools such as publication of Case series (Gaines), Dear Doctor Letters and label changes stimulated reporting of AHR's and IVH. METHODS: Cangene's WinRho® SDF safety database from USA. was reviewed and analysed for the period 1995–2009. The reporting rate of AHR and IVH were calculated based on cases submitted by year and estimates of number of doses distributed in USA for ITP. These rates were trended to determine if the communication of safety risk was effective in stimulating reporting and decreasing rates of AHR or IVH cases. RESULTS: Gaines published 15 cases of IVH after WinRho® SDF in April 2000. Label changes and Dear Healthcare Professional (DHCP) letters were issued in 2000. Gaines reported 6 cases of disseminated intravascular coagulation with IVH in September 2005 and label was changed with Dear Healthcare Professional letters issued in Dec 2005. Reporting rate of IVH was not affected by these warnings. Increase in reporting rate of AHR's was seen after publications and warning letters in 2000 and 2005. CONCLUSION: The overall reporting rate of AHR (including IVH) was estimated as infrequent (0.12%) while IVH reporting frequency was rare (0.03%). Despite significant communication through FDA publications, medical education efforts and DHCP letters, there has been no appreciable change in reporting frequency of hemolytic events following Rh (D) Immune Globulin administration. This suggests that the initial estimate of IVH occurring at approximately 1:1000 doses (Gaines 2000) is still appropriate. Disclosures: Guirgis: Cangene Corporation: Employment. Muller:Cangene Corporation: Employment. Little:Cangene Corporation: Employment. Sinclair:Cangene Corporation: Employment. Genereux:Cangene Corporation: Employment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".