MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594224414 · doi:10.4000/cdg.507

Explore Everything : Place-Hacking The City

2014· article· fr· W2594224414 on OpenAlexaff
Louise Dorignon

Bibliographic record

VenueCarnets de géographes · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCrime and Detective Fiction Studies
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comment les lieux deviennent-ils des espaces de l’entre-deux ? En analysant l’utilisation temporaire d’objets urbains, la pratique provisoire de voies de circulation, ou le recours éphémère, transitoire, voire fugitif à des lieux défendus de la ville, l’ouvrage Explore Everything : Place-Hacking the City renseigne la catégorie des espaces de l’entre-deux par une analyse pertinente de la pratique contemporaine de l’exploration urbaine. « Explore Everything », le titre de l’ouvrage de Bradley G...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0150.057
Scholarly communication0.0120.010
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations169
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCarnets de géographesSame topicCrime and Detective Fiction StudiesFrench-language works237,207