Effects of grass roots on soil-water retention curve and permeability function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of Vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides) roots on the soil-water retention curves (SWRCs), permeability (k) function, and saturated permeability, k sat , have been investigated on clayey sand (SC) and low-plasticity silt (ML). For ML soil, when the root biomass per soil volume was lower than 6.5 kg/m 3 , the saturated permeability increased, the air-entry suction decreased slightly, and the SWRC became steeper with increasing root contents, probably due to the formation of cracks caused by wetting and drying cycles during the plant growing period. Nevertheless, roots appeared to decrease the saturated permeability and increase the air-entry suction of ML soil, after reaching this threshold with a root content of about 6.5 kg/m 3 as roots occupied the macropores and tended to suppress cracks and swelling. For SC soil for all root contents, only a slight variation of the saturated permeability with root content could be observed for the upper bounds on saturated permeability. However, the lower bounds on saturated permeability appeared to decrease as root content increased. It has also been shown that for a suction range beyond 30 kPa, the influence of roots on permeability appeared to be less significant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".