Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper contains an overview of legislative framework related to the problem of climate change, especially the segment important for development of methodology of carbon dioxide emissions calculation. The role of methodology of carbon dioxide emissions calculation in reduction of total emissions as part of the Kyoto Protocol is also defined. One of the responsibilities of the Kyoto Protocol parties is to establish national greenhouse gas inventories which consist of annual calculations of carbon dioxide emissions on a defined area. The principle of carbon dioxide emissions calculation is listed according to the instructions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) from 2006. The calculation encompasses those emissions which are consequences of anthropogenic activities and are not subject of The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. Those substances are: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons and perfluorocarbons (HFCs and PFCs), sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) and indirect greenhouse gases: carbon monoxide (CO), nitrous oxides (NOx), non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) and sulphur dioxide (SO2). The methodology covers areas of energetics and industrial processes, use of solvents, agriculture, land use, land-use changes, forestry, and waste management. The methodology of carbon dioxide emissions calculation in the field of energetics in Croatia is elaborated in detail. The analysis of movement of carbon dioxide emissions in the field of energetics considering the main social and economic parameters has been made. The analysis includes movements in the past, as well as estimates of carbon dioxide emissions in the near future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".