MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Deletion of Hoxa Genes in Adult Mice Affects Hematopoietic Stem Cell and B Cell Progenitors

2011· article· en· W2594280696 on OpenAlexaff
Charles‐Étienne Lebert‐Ghali, Marilaine Fournier, Héloïse Frison, Janet J. Bijl

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHaematopoiesisHox geneStem cellHematopoietic stem cellProgenitor cellCell biologyGeneCancer researchMolecular biologyGeneticsGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2359 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Functional compensation between homeodomain proteins has hindered the ability to unravel their role in hematopoiesis using single gene knock-outs. Although several Hox genes can expand hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) when overexpressed, it remains unclear whether these genes are required for proper adult hematopoiesis. Moreover, it has been shown that HoxB genes are dispensable for hematopoiesis, and that expression of most HoxA genes is ten-fold superior to genes from other Hox clusters in HSC enriched fetal liver populations (Bijl, 2006). Using a haploinsufficient mice for the entire HoxA cluster (HoxA+/−), we have shown that adult HSCs and progenitors are particularly sensitive to HoxA gene levels (Lebert-Ghali, 2010). Thus, we hypothesize that HoxA genes have a crucial function in definitive hematopoiesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To assess the role of HoxA genes in definitive hematopoiesis, we used a conditional mutant mouse model for the entire HoxA cluster in combination with an inducible Mx-Cre model. The functional effect of HoxA cluster deletion on hematopoietic cells was analysed by culture and repopulation assays. RESULTS: Highly efficient excision of HoxA cluster was achieved by 7 doses of poly(I):poly(C) treatment (91–100%). Mice (control, n=3 and Mx-CreHoxAflox/flox, n=3) were sacrificed and analysed three days after the last injection. Immunophenotyping showed a 3 to 4 fold increase of CD150+/CD48-/CD244-/Sca+/c-kit+/Lin- hematopoietic stem cells. Despite the enhancement of the HoxA−/− HSC population, single cell cultures showed that their proliferative potential in response to growth factors was significantly reduced (p=0.036) as growth was observed only for 16.6 ± 14.4% of HoxA−/− compared to 42.4 ±10.3% of control HSCs after 3-weeks of culturing. In contrast, the number of multipotent progenitor (MPP) cells (CD34+/CD135+/Sca+/c-kit+/Lin-) was reduced, indicating a partial block from the short-term HSC (CD34+/CD135-/Sca+/c-kit+/Lin-) to the MPP transition. Colony forming cell assays showed a dramatic decrease of B-cell progenitors in the bone marrow (BM) (10-fold, p=0.0079), while myeloid progenitors were not affected by the deletion. Transplantation assays demonstrated that grafts composed of > 91% HoxA−/− HSCs have slower repopulation kinetics compared to control HSCs and strongly reduced long-term engraftment (37 ± 28% and 92 ± 6% for HoxA−/− and control, respectively, 20 weeks post-transplantation). Genotyping of engrafted donor cells is currently analyzed to confirm repopulation by HoxA−/− cells. Consistent with the observations in primary mice, peripheral blood analysis revealed also a dramatic reduction of B220+ B-cell population in mice transplanted with HoxA−/− BM cells compared to control (7.1 ± 8.5% and 56.2 ±4.8% respectively p=0,000002) Altogether, in vitro assays and transplantation assays revealed that the functions of HoxA−/− HSC seem to be impaired. CONCLUSION: Together, these results show that HoxA cluster genes are required for both HSC function and B cell development, indicating that these genes are important regulators of adult hematopoiesis. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research→French-language works237,207→