MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594353641 · doi:10.1158/1538-7755.disp16-b47

Abstract B47: Combating cancer with combination therapy in underserved populations

2017· article· en· W2594353641 on OpenAlexaff
Tina S. Homayouni, Reza Bayat Mokhtari, Albina Tyker, Parandis Kazemi, Zhenya Morgatskaya, Narges Baluch, Sara Dhalla, Shreya Rekhi, Sushil Kumar, Herman Yeger

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Canadian institutionsKingston General HospitalHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombination therapyMedicineCancerCancer therapyMetastasisDrugPharmacologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Combination therapy is an emerging treatment modality that combines two or more agents to produce a therapeutic effect. The combined use of therapeutic agents enhance efficacy compared to the monotherapy approach because it characteristically targets main key pathways with a synergistic or an additive effect. This approach potentially reduces drug-resistance, while simultaneously producing therapeutic anti-cancer benefits, such as the potential in reducing tumor growth and metastasis, arresting the cell cycle, reducing cancer stem cell populations, and inducing apoptosis. The 5-year survival rate for most cancers are still quite low, and the process of developing a new anti-cancer drug is long and extremely time consuming. Therefore, new strategies that target the survival pathways while providing efficient and effective results, as well as affordability, are being considered. One such approach incorporates the testing of therapeutic agents initially used for the treatment of different diseases on cancer. This approach is effective primarily when the FDA approved agent targets similar pathways found in cancer. Because one of the drugs used in combination therapy is already FDA approved and requires less funding to research, overall costs of combination therapy research are reduced. This increases cost efficiency of therapy and reduces the price of treatment, benefiting the “medically underserved”. In addition, an approach that combines repurposed pharmaceutical agents with other therapeutics have shown promising results in mitigating tumor size and volume. Note: This abstract was not presented at the conference. Citation Format: Tina Homayouni, Reza Bayat Mokhtari, Albina Tyker, Parandis Kazemi, Zhenya Morgatskaya, Narges Baluch, Sara Dhalla, Shreya Rekhi, Sushil Kumar, Herman Yeger. Combating cancer with combination therapy in underserved populations. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Ninth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2016 Sep 25-28; Fort Lauderdale, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B47.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.901

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.206
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionSame topicAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesFrench-language works237,207