MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Frequency and predictors of hospitalization during chemotherapy: a systematic review.

2015· article· en· W2594354048 on OpenAlexaff
Rebecca M. Prince, Monika K. Krzyzanowska, Eshetu G. Atenafu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeutropenia and Cancer Infections
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObservational studyInternal medicineChemotherapyRandomized controlled trialLung cancerCancerBreast cancerClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

6583 Background: Hospitalization during chemotherapy is a significant event from both the patient and healthcare system perspectives but little is known about how often it occurs and in which settings. We conducted a systematic review to define the frequency of and factors associated with treatment-related hospitalization among cancer patients (pts) undergoing chemotherapy. Methods: A systematic search of Medline and EMBASE databases, from 1946 to September 2013, was undertaken to identify articles reporting rates of hospitalization in pts with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Observational studies and clinical trials were eligible but results were analysed separately for each group. Summary statistics were used to describe the results and the Chi-square test was used to compare the groups. Results: Sixty articles met inclusion criteria: 44 observational studies comprising 189,342 pts and 16 randomized controlled trials comprising 13,086 pts. The majority of articles (80%) focused on chemotherapy given with palliative intent most commonly in breast, lung and colorectal cancers. The proportion of pts hospitalized at least once was significantly higher in observational studies at 32% (range 27-38%) compared with 21% (range 15-27%) in randomized trials (OR 2.13, 95%CI 2.03-2.23, p < 0.0001). A significant difference was seen in both the adjuvant and palliative settings between real life and trial pts with 42 vs 16% (OR 2.94, 95%CI 2.72-3.18, p < 0.0001) of adjuvant and 33 vs 23% (OR 3.24, 95%CI 3.03-3.48, p < 0.0001) of palliative pts being hospitalized, respectively. Factors associated with hospitalization in observational studies included higher comorbidity, type of chemotherapy and geographic location, while performance status and type of chemotherapy were significant predictors in clinical trials. Age was not a risk factor in either population. A number of methodological issues regarding reporting of hospitalization parameters were identified such as poor definitions of the at-risk period and attribution of hospitalization as treatment-related. Conclusions: Hospitalization during chemotherapy is common especially in unselected patient populations. However, few articles report this and often do so poorly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicNeutropenia and Cancer InfectionsFrench-language works237,207