Edema y hemorragia peripapilar tras consumo de cocaína
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolCaso clinico: Presentamos el caso de un varon de 23 anos que aqueja miodesopsias por su ojo izquierdo de varios dias de evolucion. El examen ocular revelo edema papilar y hemorragia peripapilar retiniana, siendo la agudeza visual de la unidad. Como unico antecedente de interes el paciente refiere consumo de cocaina en los dias previos. Discusion: El consumo de cocaina ocasiona numerosas alteraciones retinianas conocidas. La clinica descrita, en ausencia de otros antecedentes de interes y tras descartar otras causas posibles, podria explicarse por el efecto simpaticomimetico de la cocaina en el arbol vascular retiniano. EnglishCase report: We present the case of a 23-year-old male patient who had myodesopsia in his left eye some days before coming to hospital. The ocular exam revealed papillary edema and a peripapillary intraretinal hemorrhage, although he had 100% of visual acuity. He referred cocaine abuse some days before the episode. Discussion: Cocaine abuse has been associated with numerous retinal anomalies. The sympathicomimetic effect of this drug could explain the retinal findings shown by the ocular exam of this patient, after having excluded other possible causes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".