MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594442364 · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.675.675

Final Results of a Phase 2 Trial of Extended Treatment (tx) with Carfilzomib (CFZ), Lenalidomide (LEN), and Dexamethasone (KRd) Plus Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM)

2016· article· en· W2594442364 on OpenAlexaff
Todd M. Zimmerman, Noopur Raje, Ravi Vij, Donna Reece, Jesús G. Berdeja, Leonor A Stephens, Kathryn McDonnell, Cara A. Rosenbaum, Jagoda Jasielec, Paul G. Richardson, Sandeep Gurbuxani, Jennifer Nam, Erica Severson, Brittany Wolfe, Shaun Rosebeck, Andrew Stefka, Dominik Dytfeld, Kent A. Griffith, Andrzej Jakubowiak

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarfilzomibLenalidomideMultiple myelomaMedicineAutologous stem-cell transplantationTransplantationDexamethasoneOncologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction In a phase 1/2 study designed to assess KRd w/o ASCT, KRd provided a high rate of stringent complete response (sCR) (55%) in NDMM patients (pts) after a median of 24 cycles and 47.5 months (mo) of follow-up (f/u), with 4-year (yr) progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of 64% and 93%, respectively (Jakubowiak et al. Blood. 2012;120:1801-9; Jakubowiak et al, EHA 2016). To further improve response and outcomes, we designed a phase 2 study to assess KRd with ASCT. Methods The study enrolled ASCT-eligible pts with NDMM requiring tx per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria with no age limitation. Pts received initial four 28-day cycles of KRd induction with CFZ IV 20/36 mg/m2 on Days (D) 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 (20 mg/m2 given on D1, 2 in Cycle [C] 1 only); LEN PO D1-21 at 25 mg, DEX PO 40 mg/week followed by stem cell collection using G-CSF and plerixafor, melphalan 200 mg/m2 and ASCT, and KRd consolidations (C 5-8) using the same doses and schedule except LEN 15 mg in C5 with option to escalate to prior dose and DEX reduced to 20 mg weekly. After C8, pts received maintenance KRd for an additional 10 cycles using the same doses as in C8 except CFZ on D 1, 2, 15, 16 only. Single-agent LEN was recommended off-study after C18. The primary endpoint was rate of sCR at the end of C8, with minimal residual disease (MRD) among secondary endpoints. We estimated that an sCR rate of 50% or better for KRd plus ASCT would indicate superior outcome compared with a historical sCR rate of 30% for KRd w/o ASCT at this time point. Responses were assessed using current IMWG criteria. MRD was evaluated by 10-color multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) with 10-4-10-5 sensitivity and by next generation sequencing (NGS) at landmark time-points: after KRd induction (after C4), ASCT, and KRd consolidation (after C8); at the end of KRd tx (after C18); and then yearly. NGS analysis was done using the immunoSEQ® MRDplatform with a threshold at 10-6 for MRD negativity. MRD-negative status required CR, as per current IMWG criteria. Results As of July 1, 2016, enrollment was completed (76 pts); 72 pts completed KRd induction, 71 ASCT, 66 KRd consolidation, and 44 KRd maintenance with 25 pts remaining on protocol tx. Median age was 59 y (range 40-76), ISS stage II/III 57%, high-risk cytogenetics 36% as per IMWG criteria. Efficacy and toxicity data were available for 73 pts. Based on January 1, 2016 cut-off date, response rates at the end of C8 were 96% VGPR, 73% CR, and 69% sCR. The rate of sCR has been improving during the post-transplant phase of the KRd tx, from 20% post-ASCT to 69% after 4 cycles of KRd consolidation (C8), and to 82% after 10 additional cycles of KRd maintenance (C18). MRD rates in pts evaluated to date were 82% by MFC (N=33) and 66% by NGS (N=29) at the end of C8, and 90% (N=20) and 71% (N=16), respectively, at the end of C18. MRD rates in a subset of high-risk pts evaluated for MRD were 90% by MFC (10 of 11 pts with high-risk) and 63% by NGS (6 of 8 pts) at the end of C8, and 100% (6 of 6 pts) by MFC and 80% (4 of 5) by NGS at the end of C18. After median f/u of 17.5 mo, 2-yr PFS was 97% and 2-yr OS 99% for all 76 pts. For NGS and/or MFC MRD-negative pts at the end of C8, 2-yr PFS/OS was 100% and for MRD-positive/unknown PFS was 93% and OS 98%. For high-risk disease pts (N=27), 2-yr PFS was 96%. KRd-related adverse events (AEs) were generally Grade (G) 1/2, and included (any G) for hematologic AEs thrombocytopenia (57%), lymphopenia (39%), anemia (39%), and neutropenia (28%) and for non-hematologic AEs fatigue (53%), peripheral neuropathy (39%), diarrhea (3%), and infection (34%). Most common G3/4 AEs were lymphopenia (28%), neutropenia (18%), and infections (8%). Two of 71 pts evaluated pre-transplant had asymptomatic decrease of ejection fraction (EF) 45-50%, with no baseline ECHO or MUGA, all remaining pts had normal pre-transplant EF. Updated results, including larger sample of MRD data, will be presented at the meeting, with nearly all patients completing 18 KRd cycles at the next data cut. Conclusions These results show that extended KRd tx with incorporated ASCT results in high rates of sCR and MRD-negative disease in both standard and high risk disease, which correspond to high rates of PFS and OS. These results compare favorably with data from the KRd w/o ASCT study, based on pre-specified improvement of sCR rate at the end of 8 cycles and beyond, and with historical studies in NDMM. These results will require validation in ongoing and planned randomized trials. Disclosures Vij: Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Reece:Merck: Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Berdeja:Abbvie, Acetylon, Amgen, Bluebird, BMS, Calithera, Celgene, Constellation, Curis, Epizyme, Janssen, Karyopharm, Kesios, Novartis, Onyx, Takeda, Tragara: Research Funding. Rosenbaum:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Richardson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dytfeld:Janssen Poland: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jakubowiak:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SkylineDx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207