Planet–Satellite Micellar Superstructures Formed by ABCB Terpolymers in Solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The occurrence and relative stability of planet-satellite nanostructures, composed of a host micelle (the planet) accompanied by a number of guest micelles (the satellites), in ABCB tetrablock terpolymer solutions are studied using the polymeric self-consistent field theory and dissipative particle dynamics simulations. The theoretical results demonstrate that the self-assembly of the ABCB tetrablock terpolymers with solvophobic A- and C-blocks and solvophilic B-blocks could lead to the formation of various planet-satellite superstructures, where the planet and satellites are composed of the A- and C-blocks, respectively. Furthermore, the number of satellites is controlled by the ratio of the two B-blocks. The arrangement of the satellites surrounding the planet resembles the solution of the well-known Thomson's problem concerning the optimum arrangement of a given number of electrons on a sphere. Besides providing a facile route to engineering novel multicompartment micelles with planet-satellite superstructures for potential advanced applications, the study strengthens the prospect that multiblock copolymers could become a useful platform for the fabrication of complex nanostructures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".