Natural History of Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis: A Large Multicentre Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening disease, accounting for 5–15% of mesenteric ischemic events. Most cases of MVT are either identified at laparotomy or at autopsy, with a mortality rate of approximately 50% in old series. Advances in imaging techniques have facilitated the early diagnosis of MVT and, thus, have contributed to a decrease in mortality in the more recent series. The treatment of MVT involves anticoagulation alone or in combination with surgery. Experts suggest that MVT can safely be managed without surgery if there is no evidence of bowel infarction. However, information on the natural history of MVT and on efficacy and safety of long term treatment with oral anticoagulant (OAT) is based on small uncontrolled series of patients with a limited follow up. Therefore, the aim of our study is to clarify the natural history of this disease in a large cohort of patients recently diagnosed with MVT. Methods: The charts of all patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis who are currently attending or who have attended four anticoagulation clinics (Denver, Albuquerque, Varese and Palermo) were reviewed. At these centres, patients are regularly followed up for the monitoring of OAT and information on clinical events is documented and registered in a computerized database. All patients with objectively diagnosed MVT, were selected. The charts of eligible patients were reviewed for baseline clinical characteristics including sex, age, prior history of cardiovascular disease and use and type of anticoagulant therapy. Information on mortality and all objectively confirmed recurrent venous thromboembolic events were noted. Results: Seventy seven patients (mean age 49.2 years; 45 males) were included. Thirteen patients had a previous thromboembolic event. Thirty two were idiopathic. Forty six patients were on long term OAT. Median follow up was 36 months (Range 2–204 months). Seven patients had a recurrent thromboembolic event (5 splancnic vein thromboses and two PEs) for an incidence rate of 23.4 events/1000 year patient. Two patients (2.6%) had a major bleeding event (one subdural haematoma and one gastroenteric bleeding). Five patients had a VTE recurrence when suspended OAT for an incidence rate of 45.9 events/1000 year patient. Seven patients (9.1%) died during follow up (4 were related to cancer). Conclusion: patients with a previous episode of MVT have a low risk of recurrent thromboembolic events while on oral anticoagulant treatment. This risk is clearly increased after treatment is stopped. In these patients, long term anticoagulant therapy appears as a safe and effective option.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".