Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 9-year-old girl was referred for evaluation of paroxysmal events of several types with the onset beginning in the first few days of life. She was the result of a normal pregnancy born at term with healthy nonconsanguineous parents. She had a history of global developmental delay and a few remote generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Her events evolved over time and increased in frequency and duration over the years. Between events, she returned to her baseline level of function. Her events were of various types, lasting seconds to minutes (video at [Neurology.org/cp][1]), including the following: 1. Arching of the back: These events were noted by her parents in the first few days of life. 2. Right body stiffening: The patient had her first event at age 17 months. From age 3, there was an associated head turn to the right, or left. Episodes lasted up to 10 minutes. 3. Right (or left)–sided weakness: These events began at age 8, and would start with right (or left) arm weakness, followed by facial weakness, and drooling. The patient often would also have speech arrest during her episodes, upon which she would type on a mobile device to communicate. Eventually her foot would become rigid. Arching of the back occurred with prolonged attacks. Ninety percent of events involved the right side. Left-sided events had similar phenomenology. 4. Vertical ocular oscillations: These began at 6 months of age. The patient's eyes would rhythmically oscillate vertically for 10–20 minutes. [1]: http://cp.neurology.org/lookup/doi/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000343
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it