MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ISDN2014_0197: An in‐depth analysis of saccade metrics in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD)

2015· article· en· W2594567728 on OpenAlexaff
Angelina Paolozza, Rebecca Munn, Douglas P. Munoz, James N. Reynolds

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFetal Alcohol Spectrum DisorderSaccadeSaccadic maskingAudiologyDuration (music)AmplitudeMetric (unit)PsychologyMedicineEye movementNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To characterize the metrics of saccadic eye movements, researchers have relied primarily on amplitude, duration and peak velocity (the “main sequence”). Although previous studies have found that children with FASD make saccades that are quantifiably different from age-matched controls, an in-depth analysis of the metrics of saccades in children with FASD has not been conducted. Participants for this dataset were aged 5–18 years either with FASD (n = 70), or typically developing controls (n = 112). Participants performed a prosaccade task, in which they made visually-guided saccades to peripheral targets in the right and left hemifields. Metric parameters (accuracy, duration, velocity, amplitude, slope of the velocity curves) were analyzed for sex and group differences. In the control group the initial saccade of female participants had a greater amplitude and velocity than males. In contrast, this difference was not present in the FASD group, and the performance of females in the FASD group was selectively reduced compared to females in the control group. The accuracy was significantly poorer in the FASD group compared to controls, which introduced significantly greater variability in the data for the FASD group. Therefore, we conducted analyses including only those trials in which the saccade successfully reached the target. In this restricted data set, the FASD group had significantly lower velocity and duration, but not amplitude, compared with controls. Additionally, the slope of the velocity profile was selectively decreased during the deceleration phase but not the acceleration phase in the FASD group, which led to a significantly different skew index. These data suggest that children with FASD exhibit deficits in eye movement control and sensory-motor integration that implicate impairment in cerebellar and/or brain stem circuits. Moreover, we show for the first time that prenatal alcohol exposure may have a sexually dimorphic impact on eye movement control, with females exhibiting differential vulnerability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Developmental NeuroscienceSame topicNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyFrench-language works237,207