Familial Platelet Disorder and Predisposition to Myeloid Leukemia (FPD/AML) in the Absence of RUNX1 Mutations- A Report of Three Families.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Abstract 4689 Familial Platelet Disorder with Predisposition to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (FPD/AML) has been attributed to abnormalities of the RUNX1 gene, located at human chromosome 21q22. The protein product of this gene forms a critical component of the core binding factor (CBF) complex, which is required for normal hematopoiesis. Truncating mutations and deletions of RUNX1 (particularly in exons 3, 4, and 5, encoding the DNA binding and CBF-beta interaction domains) that result in haploinsufficiency or dominant-negative activity have been identified as the genetic mechanisms underlying FPD/AML. Clinically, these patients present with mild to moderate thrombocytopenia, platelet dysfunction, bleeding, and about a 35% risk of developing AML. We report on three unrelated families who share histories of autosomal dominant thrombocytopenia over two to five generations, bleeding, platelet aggregation defects, and development of myelodysplastic syndrome, AML or intriguingly, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Detailed genetic interrogation of the RUNX1 locus in the proband from each family, including complete sequencing of all 8 exons, flanking 50 base pair regions, and P1 and P2 promoters, as well as gene dosage studies, failed to demonstrate a causative lesion in the RUNX1 gene. Our findings strongly suggest that genetic loci other than RUNX1 are involved in some cases of autosomal dominant thrombocytopenia with a predisposition to both AML and CML. Identification of the disease-causing genes in these families will allow for prospective testing of family members, appropriate surveillance and early intervention in affected individuals, and potentially new molecular insights into leukemogenesis. We have broadened the genotype-phenotype correlation in FPD/AML beyond the RUNX1 gene and suggest that this syndrome may be more genetically heterogeneous than initially described. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".