L’économie sociale au Bas-Saint-Laurent : son impact à l’émergence d’un modèle de développement territorial progressis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Bas-Saint-Laurent est l’une des six grandes regions peripheriques du Quebec. Bien que la restructuration de son economie ait favorise son repositionnement sur la scene provinciale au cours des dernieres annees, cette region se distingue toujours par la persistance de disparites socio-economiques, lesquelles ont tendance a s’amplifier en fonction de la reduction de la taille demographique des localites. A l’instar a ce que nous observons a l’echelle de la province, plusieurs acteurs regionaux ont mise sur l’economie sociale dans le but de donner un second souffle a son economie. Les entreprises d’economie sociale du Bas-Saint-Laurent favorisent-elles un developpement territorial progressiste ? L’objectif de cet article consiste a evaluer la contribution sociale et economique des entreprises d’economie sociale au developpement du Bas-Saint-Laurent. Effectuee sous l’angle des representations sociales des gestionnaires de 129 entreprises, l’analyse est realisee en distinguant certaines caracteristiques geographiques et socio-economiques entre les milieux ruraux et urbains. Il en resulte une typologie cartographique des localites du Bas-Saint-Laurent en fonction de la contribution des entreprises d’economie sociale au developpement social et economique de leur milieu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".