MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594696133 · doi:10.4095/223783

Regional seismic signature of the basement and crust beneath the McArthur River mine district, Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan

2007· report· en· W2594696133 on OpenAlexaffabout
Z. Hajnal, E. Takács, Don White, István Györfi, Brian F. Powell, R Koch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCameco (Canada)Geological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyBasementCrustStructural basinSeismologyGeochemistryMining engineeringGeomorphologyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seismic-reflection profile results of the EXTECH IV project reveal exceptionally high-quality images from surface to Moho depth. First-break analysis defined the spatial velocity field, outlined geochemical alteration in the Athabasca Group, delineated much of the basal unconformity, and indicated the location of fault zones postdating the Athabasca Group. Variations in depth and changes in structural setting of the Athabasca Basin - basement unconformity are imaged seismically. Seismic-reflection images reveal structural configurations and stratigraphic properties of the P2 fault zone and the associated basement rocks to a depth of about 7000 m and along a lateral profile of 10 km. A bright band of reflectivity at about 8000 m depth, is attributed to 1270 Ma Mackenzie sills. Seismic-reflection signatures outline remnants of a major crustal reactivated shear zone with associated retrogrademetamorphism in themiddle to lower crustal depths. A relatively shallow (~35 km) Moho appears to be young, tectonically generated, and with well defined structural disturbances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207