The Relationship between Capital Structure and Financial Performance in the Companies Listed in Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange: Evidences from United Arab Emirates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the relationship between capital structure and financial performance in the firms listed in Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (ADX), Profitability Ratios were used to express of the financial performance, and the Debt Ratio was used to express the Capital Structure. A random sample from the companies listed in ADX was taken to achieve the objective this study, it consisted of 48% of all companies in this financial market, and the study period extended from 2008 to 2015. The researcher used Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), to analyze the study hypotheses, using ANOVA, model summery and coefficients for the study variables. And the results of this study showed that is positive relationship between the capital structure (Debt Ratio) and the Financial Performance (Profitability: Return on Assets) in ADX. And there is a negative relationship when we used the Return on Equity to express for the Profitability with the capital structure. The overall study results showed that there is significant relationship between capital structure and financial Performance in the companies listed in Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange, and the model of this study able to explanation almost 31% from changes happened in the profitability due to the capital structure. This result was consistent with some previous studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".