MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594760180 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22821

Rapid and continuous synthesis of methacrolein with high selectivity by condensation of propanal with formaldehyde in laboratory

2017· article· en· W2594760180 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lei Liang, Ran Tao, Jianming Shi, Xin Jing, MA Hai-hong

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethacroleinFormaldehydeSelectivityCondensationAldehydeChemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysisPhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An experimental device with a micro‐tubular reactor for continuous reaction process was designed and constructed based on the reaction mechanisms and characteristics of condensation of propanal with formaldehyde, a short mean residence time (a few seconds) for the reactive mixture was acquired to increase selectivity to methacrolein (MAL) by reducing the side reactions. Diethylamine and acetic acid aqueous solution was used as catalysts for the reaction. The reactor temperature ranged between 100 and 210 °C. The reactor pressure was set at 4.5–6.0 MPa to make sure that the reaction can be carried out in liquid phase. The results indicated that the reaction rate was heavily influenced by the concentration of the catalysts and the feed preheating temperature. When the feed preheating temperature was about 132 °C, the mass concentration of diethylamine was about 6 %, the reaction pressure was 4.5–5.0 MPa, and the mean residence time varied from 4.5 to 5.5 s, high conversion of propanal (99.9 %) and high selectivity to MAL (98.7 %) were acquired. High catalytic activity and high selectivity were maintained after the catalysts had been recycled six times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicOxidative Organic Chemistry ReactionsFrench-language works237,207