Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this series, commentaries in evidence-based nursing from the past 2 years from a specific nursing theme are brought together and highlights are discussed. The topic for this edition is care of the older person. From January 2015 to the January 2017 edition, 19 commentaries were published on the chosen topic. Three commentaries in this category related to advance care planning or palliative care were removed because they were addressed in EBN Perspectives in January 2017. Key themes were extrapolated from these commentaries and the implications for practice and future research were explored. The 19 commentaries are presented in box 1 and grouped into four themes. Box 1 ### EBN commentaries on care of the older person (January 2015–January 2017) Themes: health promotion/prevention strategies; age-related health issues; nursing care of older people and health; care institutions and the older person. Theme 1: Health Promotion/Prevention Strategies 1. Randomised controlled trial: Physical activity can successfully be promoted to older adults within a primary care setting by trained nurses http://ebn.bmj.com/content/20/1/22.extract 2. Randomised controlled trial: Self-management programme for people with dementia and their spouses demonstrates some benefits, but the model has limitations http://ebn.bmj.com/content/20/1/26.extract 3. Systematic review with meta-analysis: Mealtime assistance may increase the energy and protein intake of hospitalised older patients http://ebn.bmj.com/content/19/3/95.extract 4. Randomised controlled trial: Implementation of a feasible monthly vitamin D intervention in homebound older adults using a Meals-on-Wheels programme http://ebn.bmj.com/content/19/3/96.extract 5. Quantitative study–other: An elastic band exercise programme improves functional fitness in older adults http://ebn.bmj.com/content/19/2/64.extract 6. Systematic review: Training programmes and mealtime assistance may improve eating performance for elderly long-term care residents with dementia http://ebn.bmj.com/content/19/1/32.extract 7. Randomised controlled trial: A psychological intervention for family carers of people with dementia is clinically and cost-effective at reducing carer depression and anxiety levels over 2 years of follow-up http://ebn.bmj.com/content/18/4/128.extract 8. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".