MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594868552 · doi:10.1093/biolreprod/85.s1.717

Local Irradiation of Recipient Piglet Testes with Doses as Low as One Gray Completely Suppresses the Endogenous Spermatogenesis in Preparation for Germ Cell Transplantation.

2011· article· en· W2594868552 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Honaramooz, Monique N Mayer, Yanfei Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpermatogenesisGonocyteBiologyTransplantationAndrologySeminiferous tubuleGerm cellLeydig cellEndogenyRete testisTesticleEpididymisInternal medicineEndocrinologySertoli cellMedicineHormoneSpermBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preparation of the recipient testes can enhance the outcome of germ cell transplantation. Whether neonatal pig gonocytes have stem cell potential has not been shown. Therefore, the objectives of the present study were 1) to examine the effects of neonatal piglet testis irradiation on testis development and subsequent endogenous spermatogenesis, and 2) to investigate the potential of donor neonatal piglet gonocytes in establishing spermatogenesis after homologous transplantation into irradiated recipient testes. Nine-day-old piglets underwent daily local irradiation of testes using fractionated gamma-rays at doses of 0 (control), 1, 2 or 3 Gray (n = 6 piglets/group) for 3 consecutive days. Two months after irradiation, half of the pigs in each group were sacrificed and the testes examined. At the same time, the remaining pigs in each group were used as recipients for donor neonatal piglet testis cells. The donor cells were injected, through the rete testis under ultrasound guidance, into one testis of each irradiated and non-irradiated recipient animal, and the contra-lateral testis was injected with saline as an internal control. Two months after transplantation (i.e., 4 months after irradiation), pigs were sacrificed and the testes collected for examination. Compared with the control (0 Gray), at both 2- and 4 months post-irradiation, the testis weight indices from the group of pigs undergoing daily irradiation doses of 3 Gray were smaller, seminiferous tubule density from 2- and 3-Gray groups were lower, and tubule diameter in all irradiated testes were also lower (P < 0.05). Two months after irradiation with doses of 2 or 3 Gray, the relative number of germ cells per 1,000 Sertoli decreased (P < 0.05). At 4 months post-irradiation, spermatogenic differentiation up to elongating spermatids was observed in all non-irradiated testes, and while no spermatogenic development was found in any of the irradiated testes injected with only saline; after gonocyte transplantation, a small number of tubules in the groups of 1- and 2-Gray contained spermatogenesis up to elongating and round spermatids. In conclusion, local irradiation of recipient piglet testes with as low as 1 Gray (for 3 days) could completely suppress the endogenous spermatogenesis, and gonocyte transplantation into irradiated recipients led to initiation of spermatogenesis. (poster)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of ReproductionSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207