PERAN PELAYANAN SEKOLAH DASAR DALAM MENDUKUNG KOTA LAYAK ANAK DI SURAKARTA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<pre><em>Surakarta city is one of the first five cities that became a model in applying the concept of child</em><em> </em><em>friendly city. As one of the city that became the modeling of the concept of child</em><em> </em><em>friendly city, the city of Surakarta has made many changes to be able to realize the concept. But in Surakarta decent towards the child does not mean there are no </em><em>issues</em><em>. One of </em><em>the problem that happens </em><em>is in the field of education, especially primary schools</em><em> like </em><em>a gap of educational standards, </em><em>filling</em><em> the needs of the educational infrastructure is still not fulfilled, and the safety and comfort of children both within and outside the school. Issues contained in the education sector will have a negative impact in the process of realizing the </em><em>child friendly city</em><em> in Surakarta. </em><em>Research question</em><em> is how the role of primary education in creating child-friendly city in Surakarta. </em><em>The research method </em><em>is the type of deductive -quantitative research</em><em> with</em><em> technique analysis </em><em>is </em><em>descriptive quantitative and descriptive spatial by describing the spatial conditions in the field. The results of this </em><em>researchis</em><em> that the majority of elementary schools in Surakarta has a range of services that exceed the ideal standard, completeness infrastructure elementary school environment that is still not fullest yet</em><em> and therefore</em><em> have the </em><em>safety</em><em> and comfort on the road around the school is quite high. From the results obtained that the role of primary school services in support of child</em><em> </em><em>friendly city is still providing a sense of </em><em>safety</em><em> and comfort, although the condition of completeness lack of infrastructure facilities and </em><em>elementary school </em><em>services </em><em>is</em><em> far enough.</em></pre><pre><strong><em> </em></strong></pre><p><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p><strong><em>Keywords:</em></strong><em> child friendly cities, elementary school, the role of education service</em><em></em></p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it