MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594922780 · doi:10.1055/s-0037-1600599

Determinants of Quality of Life Improvement after Pituitary Surgery in Patients with Acromegaly

2017· article· en· W2594922780 on OpenAlexaff
Mostafa Fatehi, Camille K. Hunt, Ryojo Akagami

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsVancouver General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcromegalyDisfigurementMedicinePituitary tumorsQuality of life (healthcare)Growth hormoneHormoneInternal medicineEndocrinologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Acromegaly is a rare and slowly progressive growth disorder caused by the excessive secretion of Growth Hormone (GH). The vast majority of patients with acromegaly have a slow-growing pituitary tumor which may ultimately cause neurological deficits. However, the pleiotropic effects of GH on many organs causes a myriad of clinical comorbidities, disfigurement and pre-mature mortality. Tumor resection remains the primary treatment modality and good biochemical control is generally reported. However, it is not clear which factors have the greatest impact on quality of life (QoL) after surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull BaseSame topicPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207