MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2594948198

Edgar Heap of Birds

2016· article· en· W2594948198 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emily E. Auger

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of native studies · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Rock Art Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsPaintingArt historyContext (archaeology)Theme (computing)HistoryIndigenousTreasureArtVisual artsGenealogyLawArchaeologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bill Anthes, Edgar Birds. Durham & London: Duke University Press, 2015.232 pages. ISBN 978-0-8223-5994-4. $24.95 USD paperback.Edgar Birds is Bill Anthes's second book on American Indian art, first being his 2006 Native Moderns: American Indian Painting, 1940-1960 (Duke UP). Unlike this earlier title, Edgar Birds is devoted to documenting and establishing art historical, political, and social context work a single artist: Hock E Aye Vi Edgar Birds. Anthes succeeds in his initial goal arguing for Birds's place in history contemporary art generally, and in particular in terms developments in global art world 1980s to present (20) and his later objective, which evolved as he worked on project, foregrounding Heap Birds's practice as grounded in Cheyenne spirituality and local indigenous knowledge because such is the crux his contemporaneity (21).The first theme-based chapters is Land, which begins with a discussion Birds's Neuf series, many which are abstract paintings. Neuf means four in Cheyenne, and series became an expression artist's sense specific locations, places where people have lived and built homes, and places that his ancestors have been forced to evacuate by foreign aggressors. Most illustrations in this section, however, are word-based works. Chapter two, Words, begins with Public Enemy Care for Youth (1993), a three-print serigraph series that reads How did beautiful children become mad dogs? Whose enemy? Whose youth? These words invoke many aspects Native American life and American politics in general. Chapter three, Histories, begins with Who Owns History (1992), a series signs questioning history - written by apparent victors -of battle for control Ohio River headwaters at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Chapter four, Generations, begins with a discussion Birds's thirty-foot banner 25 Million Red Indian Lives Lost! a work intended as a reminder of human toll that accompanied rise England as a global power-and Europe and its colonial proxies -during era discovery and conquest (163).Land, words, histories, and generations are certainly thematically appropriate chapter titles, but with this arrangement Anthes is sometimes obliged to find new ways to say what he has already said, albeit with reference to different examples, as he positions Birds's text-based work under each header to identical or overlapping art historical, political, and social events and movements. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2400.160

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of native studiesSame topicArchaeology and Rock Art StudiesFrench-language works237,207