MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2595058537 · doi:10.1149/07711.1393ecst

Electrosynthesis of Glycerol Carbonate from Glycerol and Potassium Carbonate on Nickel Electrodes

2017· article· en· W2595058537 on OpenAlexaff
Hui Huang Hoe, Donald W. Kirk

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlycerolCarbonateElectrosynthesisChemistryInorganic chemistryPotassium carbonateCyclic voltammetryNickelElectrochemistryOrganic chemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reaction of glycerol and carbonate ions to produce glycerol carbonate, a valuable chemical feedstock, would solve both a glycerol problem for biorefineries and carbon dioxide emissions. The electrosynthesis of glycerol carbonate has been performed under ambient temperature and pressure on nickel plate electrodes, using potassium carbonate dissolved in glycerol with varying water concentrations. Analysis by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) with analytical standards showed the reaction produced exclusively the more valuable 5-membered-ring glycerol-1,2-carbonate, instead of the 6-membered-ring glycerol-1,3-carbonate, likely due to steric hindrance. LC-MS analysis further revealed C=O bond hydrogenation and dimerization of glycerol carbonate. Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) suggests the reaction follows an Electrochemical-Chemical (EC) mechanism. The brown color evolved from the anode indicated oxidative formation of brown polyacrolein as by-product. Addition of water was found to be beneficial by reducing heating requirements and resistive loss. From the results, the electrochemical formation of glycerol carbonate was successfully demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysisFrench-language works237,207