MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Correlation of plasma levels of free insulin-like growth factor 1 and clinical benefit of the IGF-IR inhibitor figitumumab (CP- 751, 871)

2009· article· en· W2595066197 on OpenAlexaff
Mary L. Hixon, Antonio Gualberto, Laurence M. Demers, Luis Paz‐Ares, Silvia Novello, L. Johnetta Blakely, Christiane Langer, Allan Lipton, Michaël Pollak, Daniel D. Karp

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIGFBP3MedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyAutophosphorylationIC50Insulin-like growth factorTolerabilityCarboplatinGrowth factorReceptorIn vitroChemistryChemotherapyKinaseCisplatinBiochemistryAdverse effectProtein kinase A

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3539 Background: Free IGF-1 (fIGF-1) represents the biologically active fraction of IGF-1, the main circulating ligand of the Insulin-like Growth Factor type I Receptor (IGF-IR). Signaling through the IGF-IR induces tumor survival and resistance to cancer therapy. Figitumumab (F) (CP-751,871) inhibits IGF-1-induced IGF-IR autophosphorylation with an IC50 of 0.42 nmol/L. Methods: Plasma levels of fIGF-1 were measured in a phase 1b/2 multi-center study of Paclitaxel (T) and Carboplatin (C) and F in patients (pts) with treatment-naïve NSCLC. Other serum markers of the IGF-IR pathway, including circulating soluble IGF-IR (sIGF-IR), IGFBP3 and ALS (acid-labile subunit), were also investigated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median survival times. Results: A total of 536 blood samples from 159 pts were analyzed. Baseline median and range fIGF-1 were 0.53 and 0.07–1.99 ng/mL. fIGF-1 directly correlated with IGFBP3 and ALS, and inversely with sIGF-IR (Rho=-0.430, p=0.03). Treatment with F resulted in dose-dependent accumulation of fIGF-1 with a sustained >10 fold increase in fIGF-1 plasma levels at the 20 mg/kg dose, suggesting complete systemic blockade of fIGF-1 binding to the IGF-IR. sIGF-IR decreased and IGFBP3 increased in response to F, but increases in IGBP3 were more modest than those of fIGF-1. Baseline plasma levels of fIGF-1 had a 96.6% negative predictive value for PFS status at 6 months (p=0.03). Median PFS were respectively 2.73 and 6.53 months for TC alone and TC with F (20 mg/kg) in the high fIGF-1 group (p=0.001) while no significant treatment effect of F was observed in the low (<0.54 ng/mL) fIGF-1 group. Sixty three percent of pts with high fIGF-1 had tumors of adenocarcinoma histology. Conclusions: IGF-1 is a key element in the biology of NSCLC of adenocarcinoma histology and its determination may contribute to the identification of pts who benefit from figitumumab therapy. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsFrench-language works237,207