System Cost Minimization in Cloud RAN With Limited Fronthaul Capacity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cloud radio access network (C-RAN) is emerging as a potential alternative for the next generation RAN by merging RAN and cloud computing together. In this paper, we consider the baseband unit (BBU) pool of C-RAN as a collection of virtual machines (VMs). We allow each user equipment (UE) to associate with multiple VMs in the BBU pool, and each remote radio head (RRH) can only serve a limited number of UEs. Under this model, we jointly optimize the VM activation in the BBU pool and sparse beamforming in the coordinated RRH cluster, which is constrained by limited fronthaul capacity, to minimize the system cost of C-RAN. We formulate this problem as a mixed-integer nonlinear programming problem, and then propose efficient methods to optimize the number of active VMs, as well as the sparse beamforming vectors. Moreover, we derive a closed-form solution for the beamforming vectors. Simulation results suggest that our proposed algorithms have better performance than the benchmark algorithms in terms of both system cost and robustness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".